TheMindReport

Why a Screen-Based Class Could Change Someone’s Pain Story

Chronic pain doesn’t just hurt—it reshapes how people sleep, move, work, and connect. Many want help that fits into real life: something flexible, low-cost, and accessible from home. That is why online programs have grown, blending skills like mindfulness with gentle exercise to help people manage pain day to day. The research paper Investigating the long-term impact of a programme of mindfulness combined with exercise delivered online (MOVE) on individuals living with chronic pain-an exploratory one-year follow-up of a feasibility randomised control trial asks a crucial question: do the benefits of such a program hold up one year later?

This study followed 96 adults with persistent pain who completed an eight-week online program. One group joined a live, online class that combined Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) with exercise—the MOVE program. The other group received an online self-management guide they could use independently. Researchers collected several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)—simple questionnaires about pain, mood, daily functioning, and quality of life—before the program, right after, at three months, and again one year later.

Why does this matter? In pain science, short-term improvements are common; the real test is whether people still feel and function better months down the line. This one-year exploratory follow-up reveals a nuanced picture: both groups improved from where they started, but there were no statistically significant differences between groups on most measures at one year. Still, more people in the MOVE group reported that they personally felt meaningfully better. That gap between “what the scales say” and “what people feel” is at the heart of this research—and it speaks to how complex chronic pain recovery really is.

What Stayed Better a Year Later—and What Didn’t

By the one-year mark, 48 participants completed the follow-up surveys—about half of the original group. Across the board, many measures moved in a positive direction from baseline. In the MOVE group, 10 out of 14 PROMs trended toward improvement. In the self-management guide group, 13 out of 14 showed positive change. However, when researchers compared the two groups directly, they found no significant differences overall at one year.

There were some small differences in specific areas. The MOVE group showed slightly better outcomes in depression and the mental health side of quality of life. In contrast, nine PROMs showed small advantages for the self-management group. Importantly, these were small effects, and because this was a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a modest sample, the study wasn’t powered to detect subtle differences confidently.

Here’s where the story gets more personal: on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)—a simple “How much better do you feel overall?” question—63.3% of the MOVE group said they felt improved with a noticeable change, compared to 44.4% in the self-management group. In real life, that might look like someone being able to get through grocery shopping without a flare, or feeling steady enough to attend a family dinner instead of canceling last minute. For another person, it might be being less irritable with a partner because their mood has lifted, or sleeping through the night more often. These are meaningful wins—even when standardized scales paint a more muted picture.

Small Effects, Big Meaning: How Mind–Body Training Fits the Chronic Pain Puzzle

The mixed results raise a key question: why might both groups improve, but look similar on paper after a year? One possibility is that online self-management—setting goals, pacing activity, building routines—works well, especially when people can revisit it on their own schedule. Decades of pain research show that skills like pacing, problem-solving, and sleep management can reduce disability and distress, even if pain levels don’t drop dramatically.

At the same time, the MOVE program’s blend of mindfulness and exercise targets the mind–body loop that keeps pain sticky. Mindfulness helps people notice sensations, thoughts, and emotions without spiraling into fear or avoidance. Exercise—especially when gradual and tailored—rebuilds strength and confidence, countering the “I can’t” stories that develop after months or years of pain. Past studies and meta-analyses often find small-to-moderate improvements from mindfulness-based programs and exercise for chronic pain, particularly for mood and quality of life. The hint of better mental health outcomes in the MOVE group fits that pattern.

So why no clear winner at one year? Two factors are likely. First, the study was exploratory and relatively small. With only 48 participants at follow-up, even real differences can hide in statistical noise. Second, measurement matters. The PROMs offer a standardized snapshot, but the PGIC captures personal meaning—how much someone actually feels better. The fact that more people in MOVE reported noticeable improvement suggests that the lived experience of benefits may outpace what questionnaires detect.

Finally, the online, live format itself may carry benefits that aren’t easily quantified: routine, social support, and a sense of accountability. Seeing peers on screen can reduce isolation, a known amplifier of pain. In short, the study suggests both approaches can help—and that the “best” approach may depend on what each person values, needs, and can stick with over time.

Turning Insight into Action: Simple Steps for Clinics, Workplaces, and Daily Life

For clinicians and services: Offer choice. A live, online mindfulness + exercise program like MOVE can be one track; a structured self-management guide can be another. Screen for preferences and life constraints—some patients thrive with scheduled sessions and group contact; others prefer on-demand tools. Track outcomes that matter to patients, including PGIC, not just standardized scales. Consider light-touch check-ins at 3, 6, and 12 months to protect long-term gains.

For people living with chronic pain: Pair a daily 10-minute mindfulness practice (for example, a brief body scan or breath-focused exercise) with 15–20 minutes of gentle movement—walking, light strength work, or stretching. Use pacing: stop before your pain spikes, then slowly build time or intensity. Notice unhelpful thoughts (“I’ll pay for this”) and label them as mental events rather than facts. Keep a simple progress log and include a weekly “How much better do I feel overall?” rating—your personal PGIC.

For workplaces: Flexible options help employees with chronic pain stay engaged. Encourage microbreaks for movement, support camera-off participation when fatigue is high, and offer access to short, on-demand mindfulness sessions. Train managers to check in on workload pacing, not just deadlines. Even small changes—like a regular 5-minute stretch break—can reduce flare-ups and boost mood.

For researchers and program designers: This feasibility RCT points to the need for a fully powered trial to test the MOVE approach with adequate numbers and retention strategies. Plan for mixed-methods: combine PROMs with qualitative interviews and PGIC to capture what counts to patients. Test mechanisms (for example, reductions in fear of movement or catastrophizing) and delivery features (live vs. on-demand, group size, coach contact). Evaluate adherence—was exercise completed, was mindfulness practiced—and link “dose” to outcomes over 12 months.

The Takeaway: Progress You Can Feel, Even When Numbers Disagree

This one-year follow-up suggests a balanced truth: both a structured online guide and a live mindfulness + exercise program can support meaningful improvements for people living with chronic pain, but the differences between them may be subtle on standard scales. Yet more participants in the MOVE group said they felt noticeably better—a reminder that the personal experience of relief can outpace what questionnaires capture. As we continue Investigating the long-term impact of a programme of mindfulness combined with exercise delivered online (MOVE) on individuals living with chronic pain-an exploratory one-year follow-up of a feasibility randomised control trial, the central question remains: what combination of skills, support, and delivery format helps each person get back to what matters most in their life—and keep it up a year from now?

Data in this article is provided by PLOS.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply