When a child’s feelings start affecting their learning

In many primary classrooms, “mental health” is not a distant, specialist topic—it shows up as a child who cannot settle, a child who melts down over small changes, or a usually engaged pupil who suddenly stops trying. For teachers, these moments arrive alongside spelling tests, playground disputes, and the everyday pressure to keep 30 children safe and learning. Yet the emotional needs underneath behaviour are increasingly hard to ignore.

This matters because mental health difficulties often begin early. The abstract for this research paper notes that problems can appear as young as age five, and that in England around 1 in 5 children and young people have a probable mental disorder. Northwest London adds another layer: it is highly diverse, among the most deprived areas, and faces high demand for child mental health services. That combination creates a perfect storm—more need, less time, and long waits for specialist support.

The “I think it is our responsibility, but not solely our responsibility”: A qualitative study exploring teachers’ perspectives on promoting mental health in Northwest London primary schools research paper tackles a practical question: what do primary school teachers actually think about promoting children’s mental health, and what helps or blocks them from doing it well? By interviewing nine teachers and analysing the patterns in what they said, the study reveals a reality many adults recognise at work: people are asked to solve complex human problems, but often without the training, resources, or shared responsibility needed to do it safely.

What teachers say they’re carrying—and what they can’t carry alone

The teachers described a broad range of mental health needs in children—some obvious, some subtle. Not every concern looked like a crisis. In day-to-day terms, this included anxious children who constantly seek reassurance, pupils whose anger spills out as disruption, and children coping with stress at home who arrive “already overwhelmed.” Teachers also noted that these needs are not evenly distributed; poverty, instability, and difficult home circumstances can magnify emotional strain.

A central message was captured in the title: teachers felt it is their responsibility to support wellbeing, but not solely their responsibility. They often act as first responders—spotting early signs, providing a calm relationship, adjusting expectations, and trying simple strategies. For example, a teacher might create a predictable morning routine for a child who becomes distressed by transitions, or privately check in with a pupil who has become unusually withdrawn.

But teachers also described feeling stretched across a spectrum of problems they were not fully trained to handle. They reported barriers such as limited time, limited funding, and difficulty getting children seen by the right services quickly. At the same time, they identified facilitators: supportive leadership, access to training, clear school systems, and trusted staff (such as pastoral leads) who can share the load. Finally, teachers repeatedly returned to collaboration—with families, within school teams, and with external mental health services—as the difference between “doing what we can” and “doing what is needed.”

Why “responsibility” can quietly turn into burnout

The study’s strongest psychological insight is not just that children have needs, but that teachers are working within a system that can unintentionally push them into an impossible role. In psychology, this resembles role strain: when the expectations of a job expand faster than the resources, authority, or training required to meet them. A teacher is expected to teach, manage behaviour, support emotional regulation, communicate with families, document concerns, and liaise with services—often with the same number of hours in the day.

This connects with classic ideas like Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, which argues that children are shaped by overlapping systems (home, school, neighbourhood, services, policy). Teachers in the research paper were essentially pointing out an ecological mismatch: policy encourages schools to promote wellbeing, but the wider systems—waiting lists, limited specialist input, inconsistent external support—can make school-based efforts feel like putting a plaster on a deeper wound.

Consider a realistic classroom example that reflects what teachers described. A child frequently explodes when corrected. The teacher suspects anxiety or shame, possibly linked to difficulties at home. The teacher uses emotionally supportive strategies—calm voice, predictable rules, chances to reset. The behaviour improves slightly, but the child still struggles. The teacher refers to specialist help, but the family is on a long waiting list. Meanwhile, other pupils are affected by the disruptions, and the teacher feels guilty for not “fixing” it faster. This is where emotional labour—the work of staying patient, warm, and regulated—becomes invisible but exhausting.

The study also hints at a delicate equity issue: in diverse areas, needs may be high while service use varies across groups, suggesting unmet need for some communities. Teachers can notice distress, but they cannot easily change structural factors like poverty, overcrowded housing, or limited access to culturally responsive services. That gap can leave staff feeling responsible for outcomes they cannot control—an ideal recipe for frustration and burnout.

Turning school wellbeing from a slogan into a workable system

This research paper offers practical lessons far beyond education, because it shows what happens when a workplace becomes a mental health touchpoint without the infrastructure to match. One takeaway is to treat mental health support as a team process, not an individual virtue. In schools, that can mean clear pathways: which concerns a teacher handles in-class (e.g., predictable routines, basic emotional coaching), which go to a pastoral lead, and which require referral.

For psychologists and service designers, the findings support “right help, right time” systems. A concrete example is consultation models, where a clinician regularly meets with school staff to discuss cases, offer strategies, and decide on referrals. This reduces the sense that teachers are guessing alone and can prevent problems from escalating.

For leadership and business settings, the lesson is about implementation gaps: policies fail when they do not come with training, time, and accountability. A headteacher (or a manager in any sector) can make wellbeing real by protecting time for staff training, ensuring supervision for staff dealing with high-need cases, and setting realistic expectations—“support and refer” rather than “support and solve.”

For relationships with families, the study points to the power of collaboration without blame. A teacher’s message lands better when framed as shared problem-solving: “We’re noticing X at school; what are you seeing at home, and what support would feel acceptable?” That approach lowers defensiveness and increases follow-through—especially important when families have had negative experiences with services or feel judged.

A simple question with a big policy consequence

The most memorable thread running through this study is the tension between care and capacity. Teachers are willing to play a meaningful role in promoting children’s mental health, and they already do—through relationships, routines, and daily noticing. But the paper’s title is a warning as well as a statement of values: responsibility cannot be placed on schools alone.

If early intervention is truly the goal, then schools need more than encouragement—they need systems that make collaboration routine, not heroic. The lasting question the research paper leaves us with is one that applies to any community under pressure: when we ask front-line professionals to hold more emotional need, will we also build the shared support that keeps them—and the children—safe?

Data in this article is provided by PLOS.

Related Articles

• When Feelings Move Faster Than Plans: What ADHD Looks Like for Many Adult Women
• Teaching Compassion Online: What ACT Training Gave Bereavement Volunteers—and Why It Matters
• Screening in a Single PE Class: FUNMOVES Brings Early Motor-Skills Checks to Spanish Schools
• Listening to Those Most Affected: Youth-Led Paths to Confront Ableism and Racism
• The Quiet Signals of the Body That Shape Teenagers’ Inner Worlds
• Teachers on the Front Line of Bullying What Drives Action and What Gets in the Way
• When Campus Noise Becomes More Than a Nuisance: What a 2,080-Student Study Says About Sound Sensitivity, Autistic Traits, Social Skills, and Gender
• Loneliness, Anxiety, and Emptiness: What Real-Time Mood Data Reveal About Teens’ Self-Injury Thoughts